The United States and China are locked in an escalating tariff war, with the latest round seeing U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports soar to 104% as of April 9, 2025. How will China respond? They have said they will not back down! What is at stake for each country?
This unprecedented move, part of President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” strategy, has pushed the world’s two largest economies into uncharted territory. China, for its part, has vowed to retaliate “to the end”, setting the stage for a protracted conflict that could reshape global trade dynamics. But beneath the surface of tit-for-tat tariffs lies a deeper strategic clash—one that mirrors the contrasting philosophies of poker (short-term bluffs, uncertainty, and self-belief that they hold a better hand) and Go (long-term, interconnected influence). Which player might ultimately prevail?
The Games: Poker vs. Go in Geopolitical Strategy
The U.S.’s Poker Strategy
The U.S. approach mirrors poker: high-risk bets, psychological warfare, and managing incomplete information. Trump’s abrupt tariff hikes—first 10% in February 2025, then 20% in March, and now a 50% surge to reach 104%—are classic poker moves. By escalating rapidly, the U.S. aims to force China into folding (withdrawing retaliatory measures) or revealing weaknesses.
- Bluffing: Trump’s threats of even higher tariffs (e.g., a proposed 50% on pharmaceuticals) keep opponents guessing.
- Short-Term Leverage: The U.S. prioritizes immediate economic pain for China, betting that Beijing will capitulate before domestic industries (e.g., agriculture, tech) suffer irreversible damage.
- Unpredictability: The White House’s erratic tariff announcements—often via social media—create market chaos, destabilizing China’s export-dependent economy.
However, poker strategies carry risks! If China calls the bluff, the U.S. could face stagflation, supply chain breakdowns, and alienated allies.
China’s Go Strategy
China’s response aligns with Go, a game of gradual territorial control and interconnected moves. Instead of matching the U.S. dollar-for-dollar, Beijing is weaving a web of countermeasures designed to erode American dominance over time:
- Non-Tariff Retaliation: Export controls on rare earth minerals (critical for semiconductors), sanctions on U.S. defense firms, and antitrust investigations into tech giants like Google.
- Global Realignment: Expanding the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to reduce reliance on U.S. markets while deepening ties with the EU, ASEAN, and Global South.
- Domestic Fortification: Accelerating “dual circulation” policies to boost self-reliance in tech (e.g., semiconductor manufacturing) and energy.
- Erosion of the US dollar’s dominant use in world trade and as the core currency for reserves.
- While the US has been unconsciously unwinding it positioning as a leader of the free world and the key influencer on the world stage, China has been stepping in to these gaps and highlighting the lawless and reckless style of the US under Donald Trump.
Unlike poker, Go rewards patience.
The US is trying to short-term readjust the trade balances with China, while China is trying to improve their global position on all fronts, including trade, and reduce the influence of the US as a global power. Who will win in each of these two games?
REBOOT 